Hybrid Warfare- New Threats and Entrants
Conventional strategies and practices of military and warfare, and all the implying rules and regulations attached thereto, do not fit well in the greatly evolving domain of cyber threats. Although the government's role in this realm is important, it still does not have firm control over it. The non-government affiliated agencies, groups and various other actors are taking the central role in the previously existing stages of the war. The changing dynamics of the referent with the changes in threat object makes the cyber realm a conundrum. It has apparently become hard to distinguish whether the role of a state is to protect individuals from cyber security threats arising from unidentified locations and unrecognized sources or to exploit and harm people. If the securitizing actor itself becomes the oppressor, then who else is going to protect individuals against it? The voices of individuals and certain sections of people would fill this gap. For instance, an unidentified hacker group called “Anonymous” has declared a cyberwar against Russia in response to Russian cyberattacks in Ukraine on its key agencies.
As reported by WION Web Team, the Russian space agency
has been hacked by another group connected with ‘Anonymous’ preventing the
Russian military to target more people and children as done earlier. This
reflects upon individual groups acting against state forces to counter every
form of cyberattacks. Since cyber warfare can be operated and demands a small
area compared to any other traditional practices of warfare for instance direct
military confrontations,
enables individuals and groups to take the front seat in providing security to remaining people. Thus, these new actors can be seen as security agents in two conditions: Firstly, when the state itself becomes an object of threat for the people by eroding their freedom and applying harsh methods such as panoptical surveillance and espionage through cybertechnology. Second, when a state finds it extremely difficult to protect its citizens from the targeted attacks (to critical infrastructure) of another country. The second condition can be seen in the ongoing Russia Ukraine war where initially the government of Ukraine requested the country's hacker groups to defend against Russian cyberattacks on critical infrastructures.
The Russian President has reportedly reminded the US
and West that Russia still holds a superiority in nuclear power. Undeniably,
such claims and warnings have threatened countries of the Third World about
atomic warfare. There are serious doubts and dilemmas while thinking about
cities that would be attacked, the amount of damage it would cause to people
and property. The simulation developed by Princeton University about the escalation
of war between two major players Russia and the US suggests a total of more
than 90 million human deaths at the beginning of the attacks itself. This shows
the speed at which the destruction of the earth ultimately will happen mainly
by several conflicts at the same time. Those simulations also suggested that
the first nuclear attack would probably be carried out by Russia with hundreds
of nuclear warheads. This severity will further be enhanced by the attacks from
the US/NATO, with launches of around 600 warheads. The point here is that the
number of people who would be killed is going to be historically much higher
than any other. Such circumstances discussed above put the state's role in
serious deliberations whether a state is a source of security or a source of
threat to individuals. The role of individuals as the security provider in the
cyber arena push aside gender differences by involving women and men unlike
traditional security actors in terms of security forces.
References: -
1. “'A Casus Belli': Amid Ukraine Crisis, Russia Space
Agency Head Says Satellite Hacking Would Justify War.” MSN. Accessed February
23, 2022. www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/a-casus-belli-amid-ukraine-crisis-russia-space-agency-head-says-satellite-hacking-would-justify-war/ar-AAUxsND.
2. Peterson,
J., 2022. Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. (www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-26/hackers-destroyed-data-at-key-ukraine-agency-before-invasion)
[Accessed 23 February 2022].
3. Schectman, Joel, and Christopher Bing.
2022. “EXCLUSIVE Ukraine Calls on Hacker Underground to Defend against Russia.” Reuters,
February 24, 2022, sec. World. https://www.reuters.com/world/exclusive-ukraine-calls-hacker-underground-defend-against-russia-2022-02-24/.
4. “Nuclear War Simulation Shows a War with
Russia Would Leave the Northern Hemisphere ‘Toasted’ within Hours, If Not
Minutes, with at Least 90 Million People Dead Soon after War Begins ‘a Strange
Game, the Only Winning Move Is Not to Play.’” 2022. Be Ready. January 25, 2022.
https://prayandbeready.wordpress.com/2022/01/25/nuclear-war-simulation-shows-a-war-with-russia-would-leave-the-northern-hemisphere-toasted-within-hours-if-not-minutes-with-at-least-90-million-people-dead-soon-after-war-begins-a-strange/.
Comments
Post a Comment